Article Dans Une Revue Mind & Society Année : 2002

The norms of thought: are they social?

Pascal Engel

Résumé

A commonplace in contemporary philosophy is that mental content has normative properties. A number of writers associate this view to the idea that the normativity of content is essentially connected to its social character. I agree with the first thesis, but disagree with the second. The paper examines three kinds of view according to which the norms of thought and content are social: Wittgenstein's rule following considerations, Davidson's triangulation argument, and Brandom's inferential pragmatics, and criticises each. It is argued that there are objective conceptual norms constitutive of mental content, but that these are not essentially social. A commonplace in contemporary philosophy is that mental content has normative properties. A number of writers associate this view to the idea that the normativity of content is essentially connected to its social character. I agree with the first thesis, but disagree with the second. The paper examines three kinds of view according to which the norms of thought and content are social: Wittgenstein's rule following considerations, Davidson's triangulation argument, and Brandom's inferential pragmatics, and criticises each. It is argued that there are objective conceptual norms constitutive of mental content, but that these are not essentially social.

Domaines

Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
index.pdf (298.55 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
index.html (134.73 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Licence

Dates et versions

ijn_00000250 , version 1 (01-11-2002)

Licence

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : ijn_00000250 , version 1

Citer

Pascal Engel. The norms of thought: are they social?. Mind & Society, 2002, 2 (3), pp.129-148. ⟨ijn_00000250⟩
23 Consultations
17 Téléchargements

Partager

  • More