Experimental comparison of solar methane pyrolysis in gas-phase and molten-tin bubbling tubular reactors - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Energy Année : 2022

Experimental comparison of solar methane pyrolysis in gas-phase and molten-tin bubbling tubular reactors

Résumé

This study experimentally compares solar methane pyrolysis in gas phase and molten tin. Molten media are expected to facilitate carbon separation and to enhance solar-togas heat transfer. Effects of temperature (1000-1400°C), gas feed flow rate (0.5-1.0 NL/min), and methane molar fraction in the feed (0.1-0.5) on methane decomposition were investigated in a tubular solar reactor. Methane conversion in molten tin was significantly lower than in gas phase at all temperatures (e.g., 64% vs. 92% at 1300°C). It was justified by the negligible catalytic activity of tin, the small gas-liquid surface contact (bubble diameter ~5 mm) and reduced bubble-tin contact time, in comparison with gas-phase pyrolysis (e.g., 0.83 s vs. 0.5 s for 0.5 NL/min gas feed at 1300°C). For both routes, a temperature increase (1000-1400°C) improved methane conversion (gas phase: 2-98%, molten tin: 0-91%). Increasing feed flow rate (0.5-1.0 NL/min) decreased conversion (gas phase: 93-85%, molten tin: 64-48% at 1300°C) by reducing space-time in gas phase (0.83-0.42 s) or by inducing bubbles coalescence in molten tin. Increasing methane molar fraction in the feed generally decreased methane conversion but energy efficiencies were enhanced. The carbon produced in gasphase pyrolysis was carbon black powder (50-100 nm) and carbon sheets in molten tin.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Revised manuscript solar methane pyrolysis.pdf (2.02 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-03758764 , version 1 (23-08-2022)

Identifiants

Citer

Malek Msheik, Sylvain Rodat, Stéphane Abanades. Experimental comparison of solar methane pyrolysis in gas-phase and molten-tin bubbling tubular reactors. Energy, 2022, pp.124943. ⟨10.1016/j.energy.2022.124943⟩. ⟨hal-03758764⟩
17 Consultations
146 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More