An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic pesticides. Part 4: Alternatives in major cropping systems - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue Environmental Science and Pollution Research Année : 2020

An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic pesticides. Part 4: Alternatives in major cropping systems

Andrea Veres
  • Fonction : Auteur
József Kiss
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 969098
Xavier Pons
Jaka Razinger
Renata Bazok
  • Fonction : Auteur
Ivan Milosavljević
  • Fonction : Auteur
Xuan Vi Le
  • Fonction : Auteur
Wenwu Zhou
  • Fonction : Auteur
Zeng-Rong Zhu
  • Fonction : Auteur
Hagus Tarno
  • Fonction : Auteur
Buyung Hadi
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jonathan Lundgren
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jean-Marc Bonmatin
Maarten Bijleveld van Lexmond
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

We present a synthetic review and expert consultation that assesses the actual risks posed by arthropod pests in four major crops, identifies targets for integrated pest management (IPM) in terms of cultivated land needing pest control and gauges the implementation "readiness" of non-chemical alternatives. Our assessment focuses on the world's primary target pests for neonicotinoid-based management: western corn rootworm (WCR, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera) in maize; wireworms (Agriotes spp.) in maize and winter wheat; bird cherry-oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi) in winter wheat; brown planthopper (BPH, Nilaparvata lugens) in rice; cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii) and silver-leaf whitefly (SLW, Bemisia tabaci) in cotton. First, we queried scientific literature databases and consulted experts from different countries in Europe, North America, and Asia about available IPM tools for each crop-pest system. Next, using an online survey, we quantitatively assessed the economic relevance of target pests by compiling country-level records of crop damage, yield impacts, extent of insecticide usage, and "readiness" status of various pest management alternatives (i.e., research, plot-scale validation, grower-uptake). Biological control received considerable scientific attention, while agronomic strategies (e.g., crop rotation), insurance schemes, decision support systems (DSS), and innovative pesticide application modes were listed as key alternatives. Our study identifies opportunities to advance applied research, IPM technology validation, and grower education to halt or drastically reduce our overreliance on systemic insecticides globally.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
AndreaVeres_2020_An_update_of_the_worldwide_intgrated_assesment.pdf (1.25 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Dates et versions

hal-02916388 , version 1 (23-11-2020)

Identifiants

Citer

Andrea Veres, Kris A. G. Wyckhuys, József Kiss, Ferenc Toth, Giovanni Burgio, et al.. An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic pesticides. Part 4: Alternatives in major cropping systems. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 (24), pp.29867-29899. ⟨10.1007/s11356-020-09279-x⟩. ⟨hal-02916388⟩
97 Consultations
120 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More