Who is right? Theoretical analysis of representational activities - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2019

Who is right? Theoretical analysis of representational activities

Michal Tabach
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1035090

Résumé

A theoretical discussion of possible connections between some non-conventional external representations (i.e., textual tasks of a particular format) and their corresponding internal representations (i.e., perceptions of these tasks by mathematics learners) is presented in this paper. Our goal is to analyze the interplay between external and internal representations in relation to non-conventional textual tasks of "who-is-right?" format. Such tasks involve a relatively long textual story introducing a situation that can be interpreted in (at least) two contradictory ways, which are explicitly given. The solvers of the task are required deciding which interpretation is correct and support their decision by an argument that would convince their peers. The presented theoretical analysis in terms of representations can serve as a tool for teachers and teacher educators in designing tasks specifically tailored to their students' needs.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
TWG24_20.pdf (284.1 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-02435330 , version 1 (10-01-2020)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-02435330 , version 1

Citer

Michal Tabach, Boris Koichu. Who is right? Theoretical analysis of representational activities. Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Utrecht University, Feb 2019, Utrecht, Netherlands. ⟨hal-02435330⟩

Collections

TICE CERME11
66 Consultations
60 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More