Why Propositional Quantification Makes Modal Logics on Trees Robustly Hard? - Archive ouverte HAL
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2019

Why Propositional Quantification Makes Modal Logics on Trees Robustly Hard?

Résumé

Adding propositional quantification to the modal logics K, T or S4 is known to lead to undecidability but CTL with propositional quantification under the tree semantics (QCTL^t) admits a non-elementary Tower-complete satisfiability problem. We investigate the complexity of strict fragments of QCTL^t as well as of the modal logic K with propositional quantification under the tree semantics. More specifically, we show that QCTL t restricted to the temporal operator EX is already Tower-hard, which is unexpected as EX can only enforce local properties. When QCTL^t restricted to EX is interpreted on N-bounded trees for some N ≥ 2, we prove that the satisfiability problem is AExp pol-complete; AExp_{pol}-hardness is established by reduction from a recently introduced tiling problem, instrumental for studying the model-checking problem for interval temporal logics. As consequences of our proof method, we prove Tower-hardness of QCTL^t restricted to EF or to EXEF and of the well-known modal logics K, KD, GL, S4, K4 and D4, with propositional quantification under a semantics based on classes of trees.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
final-paper-lics2019.pdf (698.75 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-02350328 , version 1 (06-11-2019)

Identifiants

Citer

Bartosz Bednarczyk, Stéphane Demri. Why Propositional Quantification Makes Modal Logics on Trees Robustly Hard?. 34th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic In Computer Science (LICS'19), Jun 2019, Vancouver, France. ⟨10.1109/LICS.2019.8785656⟩. ⟨hal-02350328⟩
104 Consultations
208 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More