ATP vs CTP policies in co-production context: the winner is not always the expected one - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2016

ATP vs CTP policies in co-production context: the winner is not always the expected one

Résumé

The impacts of using different order promising policies in traditional manufacturing industries are usually well known and documented in the literature. However, for industries facing divergent processes with co-production (i.e. several products simultaneously produced from a common raw material) as in the sawmilling industry, the evaluation, comparison, and selection of policies is not a trivial task. In this paper we compare different sawmilling industry order promising policies for various market conditions and demonstrate how and when these characteristics may call for Available-To-Promise (ATP), Capable-To-Promise (CTP), or other policies. It has been demonstrated that the best policy often differs from what would have been optimal in a classical manufacturing context (e.g. assembly).
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
2016-03-17 Article ILS Ludwig VR2.pdf (795.39 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-01425808 , version 1 (03-01-2017)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-01425808 , version 1

Citer

Ludwig Dumetz, Jonathan Gaudreault, André Thomas, Nadia Lehoux, Philippe Marier, et al.. ATP vs CTP policies in co-production context: the winner is not always the expected one. International Conference on Information Systems, Logistics and Supply Chain, ILS’16, Jun 2016, Bordeaux, France. ⟨hal-01425808⟩
159 Consultations
181 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More