Derivative Free Optimization is known to be an efficient and robust method to tackle the black-box optimization problem. When it comes to noisy functions, classical comparison-based algorithms are slower than gradient-based algorithms. For quadratic functions, Evolutionary Algorithms without large mutations have a simple regret at best $O(1/ \sqrt{N})$ when $N$ is the number of function evaluations, whereas stochastic gradient descent can reach (tightly) a simple regret in $O(1/N)$. It has been conjectured that gradient approximation by finite differences (hence, not a comparison-based method) is necessary for reaching such a $O(1/N)$. We answer this conjecture in the negative, providing a comparison-based algorithm as good as gradient methods, i.e. reaching $O(1/N)$ - under the condition, however, that the noise is Gaussian. Experimental results confirm the $O(1/N)$ simple regret, i.e., squared rate compared to many published results at $O(1/\sqrt{N})$.