Why Are Proofs Relevant in Proof-Relevant Models?
Résumé
Relational models of -calculus can be presented as type systems, the relational interpretation of a -term being given by the set of its typings. Within a distributors-induced bicategorical semantics generalizing the relational one, we identify the class of 'categori ed' graph models and show that they can be presented as type systems as well. We prove that all the models living in this class satisfy an Approximation Theorem stating that the interpretation of a program corresponds to the ltered colimit of the denotations of its approximants. As in the relational case, the quantitative nature of our models allows to prove this property via a simple induction, rather than using impredicative techniques. Unlike relational models, our 2-dimensional graph models are also proof-relevant in the sense that the interpretation of a -term does not contain only its typings, but the whole type derivations. The additional information carried by a type derivation permits to reconstruct an approximant having the same type in the same environment. From this, we obtain the characterization of the theory induced by the categori ed graph models as a simple corollary of the Approximation Theorem: two -terms have isomorphic interpretations exactly when their Böhm trees coincide.
Mots clés
Domaines
Logique en informatique [cs.LO]Origine | Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s) |
---|