Iconic enrichments: Signs vs. gestures - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Behavioral and Brain Sciences Année : 2017

Iconic enrichments: Signs vs. gestures

Résumé

Semantic work on sign language iconicity suggests, as do Goldin-Meadow & Brentari (G-M&B) in their target article, that “sign should be compared with speech-plus-gesture, not speech alone” (sect. 7.1). One key question is whether speech-plus-gesture and sign-with-iconicity really display the same expressive resources. This need not be the case, because gestural enrichments are typically not at-issue, whereas iconic enrichments in sign language can often be at-issue. Future research should thus focus on the “projection” properties of different sorts of iconic enrichment in both modalities.

Domaines

Linguistique
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

ijn_03080927 , version 1 (17-12-2020)

Identifiants

Citer

Philippe Schlenker. Iconic enrichments: Signs vs. gestures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2017, 40, pp.41-42. ⟨10.1017/S0140525X15003064⟩. ⟨ijn_03080927⟩
0 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More