Policy transfer ou innovation ? Le cas de l'activité juridictionnelle à distance en France
Résumé
Policy Transfer or Innovation ? The Remote Jurisdictional Activity in France In French law, foreign examples and the mechanisms of policy transfer have played a significant role in the genesis and development of the use of videoconferencing to remotely carry out judicial activities such as judging, pleading and sentencing. In the case studied here, references to the international dimension are more than a simple source of borrowing ; they constitute strategically mobilized resources. These are part of a more global process of innovation deployed by promoters of videoconferencing according to a particular and incremental logic. The approach developed to grasp the multiple dynamics at work as well as the consistently singular character of this process of innovation is inspired by the sociology of science and techniques. In a more general way, this borrowing demonstrates that the notion of policy transfer is not always the most heuristic for describing and understanding changes in public action and that the sociology of innovation can, in certain conditions, be particularly useful.
Cet article s'intéresse au rôle des exemples étrangers dans le processus de genèse des audiences à distance, c'est-à-dire de cette innovation organisationnelle qui consiste à équiper les activités juridictionnelles de dispositifs de visioconférence. Il propose de mettre en évidence l'intérêt et les limites d'un raisonnement en termes de policy transfer pour expliquer ce processus de genèse.
Fichier principal
DUMOULIN_LICOPPE_avant_A_preuve_mis_en_ligne_HAL-SHS.pdf (299.44 Ko)
Télécharger le fichier
Origine | Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s) |
---|
Loading...