Caste Aside? Names, Networks and Justice in the Courts of Bihar, India
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of social identity on judicial processes and outcomes at the Patna High Court over a decade (2009 to 2019). We employ machine learning algorithms to infer caste status from surnames (names) in court records. We note that a majority of court participants have ‘caste-neutral’ names. Though we find no evidence of name-based ‘matching’ between litigants and judges, caste-neutral petitioners are 3.3% more likely to choose a caste-neutral advocate. Matching, whether intentional or coincidental, yields notable consequences. Litigants with caste-neutral names who matched with similar judges face a higher likelihood of case dismissal and lower success rates in overturning appeals. However, advocates with caste-neutral names experience less disadvantage in these scenarios. Notably, the adoption of caste-neutral names, while offering some protection, does not fully mitigate the vulnerabilities faced by citizens within India's judicial institutions.
Domains
Economics and Finance
Fichier principal
Bhupatiraju_et al_2024_EJELS_Caste Aside Names, Networks and Justice in the Courts of Bihar, India.pdf (1.8 Mo)
Télécharger le fichier
Origin | Publisher files allowed on an open archive |
---|---|
Licence |