Ukrainian Danube ports: the “positive” impact of war?
Les ports ukrainiens du Danube : un impact « positif » de la guerre ?
Résumé
The question of the impact of positive radical transformations of small ports in large ports due to the war is not well studied in transport geography. An analysis of the theoretical approach to the positive impact of the development of small ports during a war has enabled me to distinguish two variants of these transformations – a rapid increase in goods traffic and the formation a naval base ultraperipheral in a small port. In both cases, there are the preliminary conditions to achieve them: the location on the seafront to escape the adversary’s effective blockade, direct access to a sea for have free relations with the world, the existence of rail line for goods traffic. Ukrainian ports on the Danube are a good example, becoming the leading ports in terms of traffic in 2022. Local ports in the ultra-periphery were radically transformed in the big ports.
Local ports in the ultra-periphery. Before the Russian invasion of 2022, the Ukrainian Danube ports were as very small ports. After the collapse of the communist system, they lost much of their traffic and were deprived of rail access. The soviet Odessa railway was divided. One part came under the control of the self-proclaimed Republic of Transnistria, other was formed Moldavian national railway company and other part was integrated in Odessa regional railway of Ukrainian national railway company – Ukrzaliznytsya. This has since prevented the transport of goods from these ports. There has also been a drastic reduction in the amount of goods that were transported by river to the Danube countries during the Soviet era. As a result, traffic in Ukrainian Danube ports ranks last among the ports of the independent period. What’s more, in 2006 Moldova managed to create a small port on the Danube – Giurgiulești. The Ukrainian Danube ports thus have a competitor that absorbs the majority of Moldovan goods. Before 2022, goods were transported by local roads. Only one road connected the Ukrainian Danube ports to the national network. However, part of this motorway crosses Moldovan territory, which sometimes causes problems with traffic control and the fight against smuggling. Gateways to the world during the blockade. The role of these ports changed radically after the start of the Russian invasion in 2022. They became Ukraine’s only window to the world. This was due to their favorable location on the cross-border river linking the Ukrainian ports with the Romanian port of Constanţa. Ukraine and Moldova have signed an agreement to reactivate rail freight traffic on the border line between the two countries (2022), which has been reconstructed by Ukrzaliznytsya. As a result, new terminals and silos have been built or are under construction, and the traffic in the Danube ports increased rapidly. Since 2022, small ports have become the main sea ports of the country as a result of the Russian invasion. More than half of grain exports in 2022 were loaded in the ports of the Great Odessa, and a quarter of in the Danube ports.
New war’s logistics chains have created in new conditions for port operations in Ukraine. For this reason, the operators must radically change their logistics. A regular 50-container train has been launched between Constanţa (Romania) and Reni (Ukraine) in 2022. Maersk has launched new container barge services from Constanța to Reni in 2023, one via the Danube Canal and the other in Romanian territorial waters. United Global Logistics has launched a container vessel service between Constanţa and Izmail in 2022. During the naval blockade, only Viking Alliance container terminal in the port of Reni continues to operate. The port of Constanța will become very important for Ukraine.
The uncertain future. The radical changes in the role of the three Ukrainian Danube ports – Reni, Izmail and Ust-Dunaysk – as a result of the actual situation are a good example of contradictory developments: large-scale negative processes have a positive effect at the local level. But what will happen after the war: will these ports maintain the same level of traffic as during the war, or will it return to the previous state?
Deux facteurs peuvent avoir une influence positive sur le développement des petits ports pendant une guerre, l’augmentation rapide du trafic des marchandises et la formation d’une base navale. Dans les deux cas, des conditions préliminaires sont nécessaires : une localisation ultrapériphérique sur la façade maritime, un accès direct à mer libre, la présence d’un accès ferroviaire. Les ports ukrainiens du Danube avaient, avant l’invasion russe de 2022, une fonction de ports locaux. En raison de la chute de système soviétique ils avaient perdu une grande partie de leur trafic et de ports moyens ils se sont transformés en petits ports. En effet, la fragmentation du chemin de fer soviétique de la région d’Odessa pénalise le transport des marchandises envoyées précédemment vers ces ports. Jusqu’en 2022, les marchandises étaient acheminées en général par la route. Un seul axe routier reliait les ports ukrainiens du Danube au réseau national, avec un tronçon de cette route traversant le territoire moldave, ce qui crée de temps en temps des problèmes de contrôle de circulation et de lutte contre la contrebande. Le rôle de ces ports a été radicalement bouleversé après l’introduction du blocus de la façade maritime de l’Ukraine en 2022. Ils sont devenus les portes d’accès au monde du pays grâce à leur localisation sur le fleuve transfrontalier. L’Ukraine et la Moldavie ont signé le 25.03.2022 un accord de réactivation de la circulation en Transdanubie sur la ligne ferroviaire transfrontalière qui, de plus, a été reconstruite en 2022. Ceci a entraîné une augmentation rapide du trafic et de nouveaux terminaux ont été construits ou sont en chantier dans les ports du Danube. Autre particularité à noter : le port d’Ust-Dunaysk a été privatisé, et c’est le premier cas en Ukraine. Les changements radicaux du rôle des trois ports ukrainiens du Danube (Reni, Izmail, Ust-Dunaysk) à cause de la guerre, sont un bon exemple de transformations contradictoires : les processus négatifs au niveau national provoquent au niveau local un impact positif. La question est néanmoins posée de l’après-guerre : ces ports conserveront-ils des trafics aussi élevés ou retourneront-ils à la situation antérieure ? Tous dépendent de l’activité militaire et de l’efficacité de la défense pour garantir la libre circulation des navires de commerce dans les eaux territoriales de l’Ukraine en mer Noire
Fichier principal
G21_-_6-pp._71-84_I.Savchuk_Les_ports_ukrainiens_du_Danube_Un_impact_-_positif_-_de_la_guerre_-.pdf (3.02 Mo)
Télécharger le fichier
Origine | Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte |
---|