Does it pay to be honest? The effect of retailer-provided negative feedback on consumers’ product choice and shopping experience - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Business Research Année : 2022

Does it pay to be honest? The effect of retailer-provided negative feedback on consumers’ product choice and shopping experience

Résumé

This research aims at investigating the potential double-edged sword effect of a retailer’s negative feedback, which may not only lead consumers to alter their purchase decisions, but also provide a shopping experience that is more effortful and thus be of less utilitarian value. Three experiments were performed involving 678 participants. Overall, results suggest a double-edged sword effect of negative feedback in online and offline retail contexts. When compared to no feedback, neutral feedback, or positive feedback, negative feedback leads consumers to change their initial product choice whatever their choice uncertainty and whatever the feedback source (human advisor or algorithmic advisor). However, it also leads to the perception of more cognitive effort and reduced utilitarian value, resulting in lower purchase and word-of-mouth intentions. The only situation in which negative feedback does not degrade the utilitarian value of the shopping experience is when consumers are highly uncertain about their initial product choice.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
S0148296322002594.pdf (416.44 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-04612187 , version 1 (22-07-2024)

Licence

Identifiants

Citer

Aurélie Merle, Anik St-Onge, Sylvain Sénécal. Does it pay to be honest? The effect of retailer-provided negative feedback on consumers’ product choice and shopping experience. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 147, pp.532-543. ⟨10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.031⟩. ⟨hal-04612187⟩
17 Consultations
6 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More