(Bio)Antropology and/or social sciences
Résumé
In this paper, we examine the controversy between the two perspectives for studying humankind: anthropology and social sciences. Anthropology overrates the clinical inventory of the socio- cognitive acts that generate a belief, by declaring that this inventory is enough to destroy the realist claim of social scientists. Researchers in social science overrate their intentional projections towards an object, by declaring that this should give them access to some absolute and unique truth. To overcome this paradox we look at the controversy between quantum mechanics viewed by Bohr and physics viewed by Einstein. Alain Aspect answered perfectly to this paradox with the two perspectives. Similarly we show that this complementarity exists between anthropology and social sciences.