In response to the dynamic landscape of remote work and coworking spaces, collaborative initiatives have been undertaken by the AlpSatellites partners from France, Italy, and Austria. These endeavours aim to explore inventive solutions that effectively tackle the challenges and seize the opportunities presented by the transformative shift in this paradigm. Particularly emphasized during action 1.3 of the project, the primary focus was on crafting solutions tailored to the distinctive needs of each territory. The subsequent final phase of the project involved a comprehensive analysis of the solutions devised by all partners. This document includes the various feasibility studies conducted by each country for their respective solutions. While there are shared characteristics and challenges among the countries, the regions also exhibit notable differences. Consequently, the maturity level of each country’s solution varies, reflecting the nuanced considerations inherent in addressing the diverse landscapes and demands of remote work and coworking spaces. Each country therefore represents increased focus on either the financial and/or technical viability and/or scalability of the proposed solutions, their potential social, economic and/or environmental impact and their transferability. The French partners adopted a collaborative approach, engaging regional stakeholders in the last phase of action. They conducted a feasibility study using an Action Sheet and a Business Model Canvas, focusing on a shared digital platform for remote workers in a new territory. The proposed platform aims to provide practical information and enhance the remote worker experience, with a cost-effective strategy financed by local authorities, subsidies, and potential European funding, to be validated by a team coordinated by PETR (Pôle d’Equilibre Territorial et Rural1) and in agreement with communes. Italy implemented a methodology to assess the economic feasibility of establishing coworking spaces. The evaluation considered operational costs and potential revenues, providing insights into the viability of such spaces in different geographical sub-areas. Austria, recognizing the transferability of its solution, structured a comprehensive framework and guidelines for implementing similar projects. The feasibility and impact study, designed as a set of guidelines, utilized various tools such as the Business Model Canvas, SWOT analysis, and risk matrix. The proposed solution from action 1.3 was approached as a project, necessitating a classical project management approach, with a focus on clear goals, feasibility/resource lists, cost-benefit analysis, and risk assessment. Each country’s approach was unique, tailored to its specific needs and regional characteristics. The collaboration among key stakeholders, clear goal setting, feasibility studies, and risk assessments were common threads binding these initiatives. The following sections delve into the specifics of each country’s strategy and findings, providing a comprehensive understanding of their endeavours in navigating the remote work and coworking landscape. The whole document is structured as follows. The first country introduced is France since they conducted a very generic feasibility study, followed by Austria with a more concrete management approach. The last country is Italy with the most detailed feasibility study. In chapter 2 we present the methodology each country followed, explaining how the feasibility study and whole process was conducted. Chapter 3 is the heart of the document representing the findings of each feasibility study. The last chapter is a small summary and conclusion of the document. In conclusion, the collaborative efforts undertaken in France, Italy, and Austria reflect a commitment to addressing the challenges and opportunities presented by remote working and the establishment of coworking spaces. In France, the focus on a shared digital platform for remote workers involved a meticulous feasibility study, utilizing tools such as the Action Sheet and Business Model Canvas. The approach emphasized clarity, collaboration, and a strategic orientation, reflecting a comprehensive understanding of remote workers’ needs. In Italy, the economic feasibility analysis for coworking spaces in the Aosta Valley demonstrated a methodical approach, considering operational costs, potential revenues, and a unique estimation of market potential. Despite acknowledged limitations, the study provided a comprehensive assessment, highlighting both opportunities and threats for the Unité des Communes Valdôtaines Evancon. Austria presented a solution designed for transferability, offering a detailed framework and guidelines for implementing similar projects. The feasibility and impact study encompassed a SWOT analysis, risk matrix, and a thorough assessment of resources, costs, and benefits. The proposed solution emphasized not only financial aspects but also the social, cultural, and economic enrichment that such initiatives can bring to diverse regions. Each case study exhibited a commitment to efficient management, cost-saving strategies, and the consideration of local needs to enhance feasibility. Among other public-private partnerships were suggested repeatedly as a means to support the economic viability of coworking spaces. The potential impacts on economic diversification, environmental sustainability, and social cohesion were highlighted, underscoring the positive contributions of these initiatives to regional development. In essence, these initiatives demonstrated a holistic approach, acknowledging the multifaceted nature of challenges and opportunities related to remote working and community/coworking spaces. As regions continue to explore innovative solutions, the lessons learned from these collaborative efforts can serve as valuable guides for future projects, promoting sustainable development, economic growth, and community well-being.