Comparing climate pledges and eco-taxation in a networked agricultural supply chain organisation - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue European Review of Agricultural Economics Année : 2024

Comparing climate pledges and eco-taxation in a networked agricultural supply chain organisation

Résumé

Abstract This paper examines the effectiveness of climate pledges and eco-taxation as strategies for mitigating climate change within a networked agricultural supply chain organisation. We utilise variational inequality techniques within a multicriteria decision-making framework and validate our theoretical findings through numerical simulations using a machine learning augmented algorithm. By employing this approach, we position the Agricultural Sector Roadmap, aimed at capping global warming at 1.5°C, within the wider agricultural sector’s climate action framework. Our results demonstrate that environmental taxation emerges as the most effective approach for addressing climate change. Eco-taxation leads to a 57.87 per cent reduction in global emissions, whereas climate pledges only account for a 20.59 per cent reduction at the same level of production. Furthermore, eco-taxation results in a 45.68 per cent greater reduction in emission intensity compared to climate pledges. In contrast to climate commitments, an eco-fiscal policy is capable of achieving the objectives established by the European Union.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-04510138 , version 1 (18-03-2024)

Identifiants

Citer

Arnaud Z. Dragicevic, Jean-Christophe Pereau. Comparing climate pledges and eco-taxation in a networked agricultural supply chain organisation. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2024, pp.1-45. ⟨10.1093/erae/jbae001⟩. ⟨hal-04510138⟩

Collections

CNRS
0 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More