Sex disparities in cardiogenic shock: Insights from the FRENSHOCK registry - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Critical Care Année : 2024

Sex disparities in cardiogenic shock: Insights from the FRENSHOCK registry

Caroline Hauw-Berlemont
  • Fonction : Auteur
Nadia Aissaoui
  • Fonction : Auteur
Eric Bonnefoy
  • Fonction : Auteur
Laurent Bonello
  • Fonction : Auteur
Meyer Elbaz
  • Fonction : Auteur
Olivier Morel
  • Fonction : Auteur
Bruno Levy
  • Fonction : Auteur
Bernard Jouve
  • Fonction : Auteur
Brahim Harbaoui
  • Fonction : Auteur
Gérald Vanzetto
  • Fonction : Auteur
Nicolas Combaret
  • Fonction : Auteur
Benoit Lattucca
  • Fonction : Auteur
Sébastien Champion
  • Fonction : Auteur
Cédric Bruel
  • Fonction : Auteur
Francis Schneider
  • Fonction : Auteur
Marie-France Seronde
  • Fonction : Auteur
Vincent Bataille
  • Fonction : Auteur
Edouard Gerbaud
  • Fonction : Auteur
Etienne Puymirat
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the most severe form of acute heart failure. Discrepancies have been reported between sexes regarding delays, pathways and invasive strategies in CS complicating acute myocardial infarction. However, effect of sex on the prognosis of unselected CS remains controversial. Objectives: The aim was to analyze the impact of sex on aetiology, management and prognosis of CS. Methods: The FRENSHOCK registry included all CS admitted in 49 French Intensive Care Units (ICU) and Intensive Cardiac Care Units (ICCU) between April and October 2016. Results: Among the 772 CS patients included, 220 were women (28.5%). Women were older, less smokers, with less history of ischemic cardiac disease (20.5% vs 33.6%) than men. At admission, women presented less cardiac arrest (5.5 vs 12.2%), less mottling (32.5 vs 41.4%) and higher LVEF (30 ± 14 vs 25 ± 13%). Women were more often managed via emergency department while men were directly admitted at ICU/ICCU. Ischemia was the most frequent trigger irrespective of sex (36.4% in women vs 38.2%) but women had less coronary angiogram and PCI (45.9% vs 54% and 24.1 vs 31.3%, respectively). We found no major difference in medication and organ support. Thirty-day mortality (26.4 vs 26.5%), transplant or permanent assist device were similar in both sexes. Conclusion: Despite some more favorable parameters in initial presentation and no significant difference in medication and support, women shared similar poor prognosis than men. Further analysis is required to cover the lasting gap in knowledge regarding sex specificities to distinguish between differences and inequalities. NCT02703038.

Dates et versions

hal-04508490 , version 1 (18-03-2024)

Licence

Paternité

Identifiants

Citer

Stéphane Manzo-Silberman, Anne-Céline Martin, Florence Boissier, Caroline Hauw-Berlemont, Nadia Aissaoui, et al.. Sex disparities in cardiogenic shock: Insights from the FRENSHOCK registry. Journal of Critical Care, 2024, 82, pp.154785. ⟨10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154785⟩. ⟨hal-04508490⟩
4 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More