Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults: the 2022 ESSKA consensus part III-indications for different clinical scenarios using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Année : 2023

Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults: the 2022 ESSKA consensus part III-indications for different clinical scenarios using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method

Thomas Tischer
  • Fonction : Auteur
Luca Andriolo
Philippe Beaufils
  • Fonction : Auteur
Sufian Ahmad
  • Fonction : Auteur
Corrado Bait
  • Fonction : Auteur
Marco Bonomo
  • Fonction : Auteur
Riccardo Cristiani
  • Fonction : Auteur
Matthias Feucht
  • Fonction : Auteur
Markas Fiodorovas
  • Fonction : Auteur
Alberto Grassi
  • Fonction : Auteur
Gijs Helmerhorst
  • Fonction : Auteur
Christian Hoser
  • Fonction : Auteur
Mustafa Karahan
  • Fonction : Auteur
George Komnos
  • Fonction : Auteur
Koen Carl Lagae
  • Fonction : Auteur
Vincenzo Madonna
  • Fonction : Auteur
Edoardo Monaco
  • Fonction : Auteur
Juan Carlos Monllau
  • Fonction : Auteur
Mikko Ovaska
  • Fonction : Auteur
Wolf Petersen
  • Fonction : Auteur
Tomasz Piontek
  • Fonction : Auteur
James Robinson
  • Fonction : Auteur
Kristian Samuelsson
  • Fonction : Auteur
Sven Scheffler
  • Fonction : Auteur
Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
  • Fonction : Auteur
Giuseppe Filardo
  • Fonction : Auteur
Vincenzo Condello
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

Purpose The aim of the ESSKA 2022 consensus Part III was to develop patient-focused, contemporary, evidencebased, guidelines on the indications for revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery (ACLRev). Methods The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) was used to provide recommendations on the appropriate-ness of surgical treatment versus conservative treatment in different clinical scenarios based on current scientific evidence in conjunction with expert opinion. A core panel defined the clinical scenarios with a moderator and then guided a panel of 17 voting experts through the RAM tasks. Through a two-step voting process, the panel established a consensus as to the appropriateness of ACLRev for each scenario based on a nine-point Likert scale (in which a score in the range 1-3 was considered 'inappropriate', 4-6 'uncertain', and 7-9 'appropriate'). Results The criteria used to define the scenarios were: age (18-35 years vs 36-50 years vs 51-60 years), sports activity and expectation (Tegner 0-3 vs 4-6 vs 7-10), instability symptoms (yes vs no), meniscus status (functional vs repairable vs non-functional meniscus), and osteoarthritis (OA) (Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] grade 0-I-II vs grade III). Based on these variables, a set of 108 clinical scenarios was developed. ACLRev was considered appropriate in 58%, inappropriate in 12% (meaning conservative treatment is indicated), and uncertain in 30%. Experts considered ACLRev appropriate for patients with instability symptoms, aged ≤ 50 years, regardless of sports activity level, meniscus status, and OA grade. Results were much more controversial in patients without instability symptoms, while higher inappropriateness was related to scenarios with older age (51-60 years), low sporting expectation, non-functional meniscus, and knee OA (KL III). Conclusion This expert consensus establishes guidelines as to the appropriateness of ACLRev based on defined criteria and provides a useful reference for clinical practice in determining treatment indications. Level of evidence II.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
s00167-023-07401-3_HAL.pdf (1.04 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-04483075 , version 1 (29-02-2024)

Identifiants

Citer

Thomas Tischer, Luca Andriolo, Philippe Beaufils, Sufian Ahmad, Corrado Bait, et al.. Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults: the 2022 ESSKA consensus part III-indications for different clinical scenarios using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2023, 31 (11), pp.4662-4672. ⟨10.1007/s00167-023-07401-3⟩. ⟨hal-04483075⟩
9 Consultations
1 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More