Maintaining the meritocracy myth : A critical discourse analytic study of leaders’ talk about merit and gender in academia - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Organization Studies Année : 2024

Maintaining the meritocracy myth : A critical discourse analytic study of leaders’ talk about merit and gender in academia

Cheryl Hurst
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jennifer Tomlinson
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

The belief in meritocracy – that advancement is based solely on individual capabilities and hard work – remains ingrained in organizations despite evidence it is a flawed concept that perpetuates gender and other social inequalities. Critical streams of research have highlighted the ideological character of meritocracy discourse, its entrenched nature and acceptance as ‘common-sense’. Less is known about how this ‘meritocracy myth’ is maintained, that is, how this hegemonic discourse retains its potency in day-to-day talk in organizations. We argue that leaders, given their active discursive roles and opportunities to establish and control discourses, play an important but underexamined role in the reproduction and legitimization of this seemingly progressive yet ultimately destructive discourse. We conduct a critical discourse analysis (CDA) drawing on qualitative interviews with leaders in higher education institutions (HEIs) in the UK focusing on their talk about women’s recruitment and progression in academic roles. We identify three discursive interventions through which leaders routinely maintain and reinforce and on occasion challenge the existing system of meritocracy: invisibilizing gender inequality through gender-neutrality; denying constraints through individualization; and problematising meritocracy to uphold or challenge the status quo. We argue that by uncovering the means through which meritocracy discourse retains its resilience, our paper offers the opportunity to scrutinize and challenge these discursive underpinnings that uphold the ‘meritocracy myth’. We suggest it is possible to re-imagine what might be considered ‘merit worthy’ in universities recognising and centring structural gender and other social inequalities to create more equal institutions.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
746258-clarke-et-al-2024-maintaining-the-meritocracy-myth-a-critical-discourse-analytic-study-of-leaders-talk-about-merit-and (1).pdf (817.06 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-04479149 , version 1 (27-02-2024)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-04479149 , version 1

Citer

Jean Clarke, Cheryl Hurst, Jennifer Tomlinson. Maintaining the meritocracy myth : A critical discourse analytic study of leaders’ talk about merit and gender in academia. Organization Studies, In press, 52 p. ⟨hal-04479149⟩

Collections

EMLYON
30 Consultations
13 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More