On the role of psychologists in the international New Math movement
Résumé
The birth of the New Math movement in Europe is closely linked to the work of Bourbaki in pure
mathematics, but it was the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget who provided the psychological
justification by assuming a link between the structures of modern mathematics and the structures of
children’s cognitive development. In the US, Jerome Bruner played an analogous role by providing
Edward G. Begle’s School Mathematics Study Group a psychological justification for extending its
action to the primary level. However, not all psychologists of the 1950s and 1960s had unconditional
faith in the New Math reform. Already at Royaumont, William D. Wall, a leading British psychologist
and educationalist, reproached the reformers for basing their actions on unverified opinion rather
than careful psycho-pedagogical research. Methodological criticism was also voiced by the Belgian
school psychologist Fernand Hotyat, but the reformers claimed they had no alternative.
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)