An Argumentation Framework based on contextual Preferences - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2000

An Argumentation Framework based on contextual Preferences

Résumé

Argumentation is one of the promising approaches to handle inconsistency in knowledge bases. It consists of constructing arguments and counter-arguments (defeaters) and then selecting the most acceptable of them. In [1], a preference-based argumentation framework has been proposed. In that framework, the knowledge base is supposed to be equipped with a preordering between the beliefs. However there are limits to what can be achieved with this framework since it does not take into account the case where several preorderings on the beliefs (contextual preferences) are available. The aim of this paper is to extend the framework defined in [1] in order to reason from multiple points of view on an inconsistent knowledge base.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-04329692 , version 1 (07-12-2023)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-04329692 , version 1

Citer

Leila Amgoud, Simon Parsons, Laurent Perrussel. An Argumentation Framework based on contextual Preferences. 3rd International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning (FAPR 2000), Sep 2000, London, United Kingdom. pp.59--67. ⟨hal-04329692⟩
21 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More