Repeatability, Reproducibility, Replicability, Reusability (4R) in Journals' Policies and Software/Data Management in Scientific Publications: A Survey, Discussion, and Perspectives - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Pré-Publication, Document De Travail Année : 2023

Repeatability, Reproducibility, Replicability, Reusability (4R) in Journals' Policies and Software/Data Management in Scientific Publications: A Survey, Discussion, and Perspectives

Résumé

With the recognized crisis of credibility in scientific research, there is a growth of reproducibility studies in computer science, and although existing surveys have reviewed reproducibility from various perspectives, especially very specific technological issues, they do not address the author-publisher relationship in the publication of reproducible computational scientific articles. This aspect requires significant attention because it is the basis for reliable research. We have found a large gap between the reproducibility-oriented practices, journal policies, recommendations, publisher artifact Description/Evaluation guidelines, submission guides, technological reproducibility evolution, and its effective adoption to contribute to tackling the crisis. We conducted a narrative survey, a comprehensive overview and discussion identifying the mutual efforts required from Authors, Journals, and Technological actors to achieve reproducibility research. The relationship between authors and scientific journals in their mutual efforts to jointly improve the reproducibility of scientific results is analyzed. Eventually, we propose recommendations for the journal policies, as well as a unified and standardized Reproducibility Guide for the submission of scientific articles for authors. The main objective of this work is to analyze the implementation and experiences of reproducibility policies, techniques and technologies, standards, methodologies, software, and data management tools required for scientific reproducible publications. Also, the benefits and drawbacks of such an adoption, as well as open challenges and promising trends, to propose possible strategies and efforts to mitigate the identified gaps. To this purpose, we analyzed 200 scientific articles, surveyed 16 Computer Science journals, and systematically classified them according to reproducibility strategies, technologies, policies, code citation, and editorial business. We conclude there is still a reproducibility gap in scientific publications, although at the same time also the opportunity to reduce this gap with the joint effort of authors, publishers, and technological providers.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
main.pdf (1.58 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Licence : CC BY ND - Paternité - Pas de modifications

Dates et versions

hal-04322522 , version 1 (07-12-2023)

Identifiants

Citer

José Armando Hernández, Miguel Colom. Repeatability, Reproducibility, Replicability, Reusability (4R) in Journals' Policies and Software/Data Management in Scientific Publications: A Survey, Discussion, and Perspectives. 2023. ⟨hal-04322522⟩
315 Consultations
124 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More