Delegation to artificial agents fosters prosocial behaviors in the collective risk dilemma - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Scientific Reports Année : 2022

Delegation to artificial agents fosters prosocial behaviors in the collective risk dilemma

Elias Fernández Domingos
  • Fonction : Auteur
Inês Terrucha
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jelena Grujić
  • Fonction : Auteur
Juan Burguillo
  • Fonction : Auteur
Francisco Santos
  • Fonction : Auteur
Tom Lenaerts
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

Home assistant chat-bots, self-driving cars, drones or automated negotiation systems are some of the several examples of autonomous (artificial) agents that have pervaded our society. These agents enable the automation of multiple tasks, saving time and (human) effort. However, their presence in social settings raises the need for a better understanding of their effect on social interactions and how they may be used to enhance cooperation towards the public good, instead of hindering it. To this end, we present an experimental study of human delegation to autonomous agents and hybrid human-agent interactions centered on a non-linear public goods dilemma with uncertain returns in which participants face a collective risk. Our aim is to understand experimentally whether the presence of autonomous agents has a positive or negative impact on social behaviour, equality and cooperation in such a dilemma. Our results show that cooperation and group success increases when participants delegate their actions to an artificial agent that plays on their behalf. Yet, this positive effect is less pronounced when humans interact in hybrid human-agent groups, where we mostly observe that humans in successful hybrid groups make higher contributions earlier in the game. Also, we show that participants wrongly believe that artificial agents will contribute less to the collective effort. In general, our results suggest that delegation to autonomous agents has the potential to work as commitment devices, which prevent both the temptation to deviate to an alternate (less collectively good) course of action, as well as limiting responses based on betrayal aversion.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
s41598-022-11518-9.pdf (1.2 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Dates et versions

hal-04296038 , version 1 (12-03-2024)

Identifiants

Citer

Elias Fernández Domingos, Inês Terrucha, Rémi Suchon, Jelena Grujić, Juan Burguillo, et al.. Delegation to artificial agents fosters prosocial behaviors in the collective risk dilemma. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12 (1), pp.8492. ⟨10.1038/s41598-022-11518-9⟩. ⟨hal-04296038⟩

Collections

ETHICS
6 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More