Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III EMERALD Trial - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Clinical Oncology Année : 2022

Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III EMERALD Trial

Francois-Clement Bidard
Virginia Kaklamani
Patrick Neven
  • Fonction : Auteur
Guillermo Streich
  • Fonction : Auteur
Alberto Montero
Frédéric Forget
  • Fonction : Auteur
Joo Hyuk Sohn
Donatienne Taylor
Kathleen Harnden
Hung Khong
Judit Kocsis
  • Fonction : Auteur
Florence Dalenc
  • Fonction : Auteur
Patrick Dillon
Sunil Babu
  • Fonction : Auteur
Simon Waters
Ines Deleu
  • Fonction : Auteur
José García Sáenz
  • Fonction : Auteur
Emilio Bria
Marina Cazzaniga
Janice Lu
  • Fonction : Auteur
Philippe Aftimos
Javier Cortés
Shubin Liu
  • Fonction : Auteur
Giulia Tonini
  • Fonction : Auteur
Dirk Laurent
  • Fonction : Auteur
Nassir Habboubi
  • Fonction : Auteur
Maureen Conlan
  • Fonction : Auteur
Aditya Bardia

Résumé

PURPOSE Patients with pretreated estrogen receptor (ER)–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative advanced breast cancer have poor prognosis. Elacestrant is a novel, oral selective ER degrader that demonstrated activity in early studies. METHODS This randomized, open-label, phase III trial enrolled patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had one-two lines of endocrine therapy, required pretreatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, and ≤ 1 chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to elacestrant 400 mg orally once daily or standard-of-care (SOC) endocrine monotherapy. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review in all patients and patients with detectable ESR1 mutations. RESULTS Patients were randomly assigned to elacestrant (n = 239) or SOC (n = 238). ESR1 mutation was detected in 47.8% of patients, and 43.4% received two prior endocrine therapies. PFS was prolonged in all patients (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.88; P = .002) and patients with ESR1 mutation (hazard ratio = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77; P = .0005). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 7.2% receiving elacestrant and 3.1% receiving SOC. Treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment discontinuations were 3.4% in the elacestrant arm versus 0.9% in SOC. Nausea of any grade occurred in 35.0% receiving elacestrant and 18.8% receiving SOC (grade 3/4, 2.5% and 0.9%, respectively). CONCLUSION Elacestrant is the first oral selective ER degrader demonstrating a significant PFS improvement versus SOC both in the overall population and in patients with ESR1 mutations with manageable safety in a phase III trial for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Dates et versions

hal-03867806 , version 1 (23-11-2022)

Identifiants

Citer

Francois-Clement Bidard, Virginia Kaklamani, Patrick Neven, Guillermo Streich, Alberto Montero, et al.. Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III EMERALD Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2022, 40 (28), pp.3246-3256. ⟨10.1200/JCO.22.00338⟩. ⟨hal-03867806⟩
24 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More