生态文明时代的共生法哲学 - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue 环球法律评论 / Global Law Review [Revue globale du droit] Année : 2019

Legal Philosophy of Coexistence in the Era of Ecological Civilization

La Philosophie du Droit pour la Coexistence à l'ère de la Civilisation Ecologique

生态文明时代的共生法哲学

Résumé

In the transition from industrial civilization to ecological civilization, the idea of “protection and utilization” in the era of environmental law has also been transformed into the idea of “coexistence” in the era of ecological law. As a result, the dichotomy between man and nature as the foundation of the contemporary legal order has been questioned. Through detailed field research, Descola provided us with four modes of thinking about the relationship between man and nature, from which we can extract a pluralistic ontological stance. Latour, on the other hand, conceived a cognitive framework at the political and philosophical level to determine the order of the coexistence of all things. In China, despite of the proposed ecological civilization construction policy, the law still regards the environment as an object that can be used but also needs to be protected. In European countries, although the idea of people owning the environment has continued, the new legal practice is tending to recognize the intrinsic value of the ecosphere. New international law recognizes the value of the nature, while facing up to the interdependence between nature and human society. In lawsuits about ecological governance, the judgment of the court relies more and more on scientific evidence, while scientists also more and more actively seeking the endorsement of the judicial authority for their scientific discovery. The distinction between human society and nature has never really become a reality, and it is inevitable for this distinction to be transcended. In conclusion, the legal philosophy of coexistence in the era of ecological law requires us to try to coexist with all things in nature.
从工业文明向生态文明的转型中,环境法时代的“保护利用”思路转变为生态法时代的“共生”思路。作为当代法秩序基础的人与自然的二元划分因此备受质疑。德科拉以详尽的田野调查为我们提供了四种思考人与自然关系的模式,从中可以提炼出一种多元主义的本体论立场。拉图尔则在政治哲学层面构想了一种确定万物共生之秩序的认识框架。尽管提出了生态文明建设的方针,我国法律仍然把环境作为一个可以利用、但也需要保护的客体。欧洲各国虽然也延续了人拥有环境的思路,但是新的法律实践已经倾向承认生态圈的内在价值。新的国际法承认自然价值的同时正视自然与人类社会的依存关系。生态治理的诉讼中,法庭的裁判越来越依赖科学的证据,科学的发现也越发积极地寻求司法权威的背书。人类社会和自然之间的区分从来没有真正变成现实,超越这种区分也就成了必然。总之,生态法时代的共生法哲学要求我们尝试与万物共生于自然中。

Domaines

Droit
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Legal Philosophy of Coexistence in the Era of Ecological Civilization.pdf (6.86 Mo) Télécharger le fichier

Dates et versions

hal-03861067 , version 1 (13-01-2023)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-03861067 , version 1

Citer

Mingzhe Zhu. 生态文明时代的共生法哲学. 环球法律评论 / Global Law Review [Revue globale du droit], 2019, 41 (02), pp.38-52. ⟨hal-03861067⟩
9 Consultations
9 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More