Continuity and rupture between argumentation and proof in historical texts and physics textbooks on parabolic motion - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2022

Continuity and rupture between argumentation and proof in historical texts and physics textbooks on parabolic motion

Résumé

In this paper, we analyze different presentations in a historical text by Galilei and a textbook for high school of the parabolic motion of a projectile with a lens developed within Mathematics education research on argumentation and proof (cognitive unity; Mariotti et al., 1997; Pedemonte, 2005). The analysis highlights possibilities and problematic issues, with particular attention to the aspects related to continuity and rupture between argumentation and proof in textbooks and the different interdisciplinary relationships between mathematics and physics mirrored by historical sources and textbooks. We discuss how a comparison between them can be exploited to develop a discourse about interdisciplinary that can enlarge the view of the relationship between the two disciplines and didactical implications that can be inferred from this comparison.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
TWG01_04_Branchetti.pdf (323.43 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-03740310 , version 1 (29-07-2022)
hal-03740310 , version 2 (17-10-2022)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-03740310 , version 2

Citer

Laura Branchetti, Alessia Cattabriga, Olivia Levrini, Sara Satanassi. Continuity and rupture between argumentation and proof in historical texts and physics textbooks on parabolic motion. Twelfth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME12), Feb 2022, Bozen-Bolzano, Italy. ⟨hal-03740310v2⟩

Collections

CERME12
38 Consultations
31 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More