Complexation of Cm(III) with aqueous phosphates at elevated temperatures: a luminescence, thermodynamic, and ab initio study
Résumé
The incorporation of actinides in lanthanide phosphate matrices crystallizing in the monazite structure has been intensely investigated in the past decades due to the relevance of these monazites as potential ceramic host phases for the immobilization of specific high level radioactive waste (HLW) streams [1-3]. In recent years, understanding the incorporation behaviour of trivalent dopants in the LnPO4•xH2O rhabdophane structure has been given more attention [4,5]. Rhabdophane is the hydrated phosphate precursor in the synthesis of monazites through precipitation routes and a potential secondary mineral controlling actinide solubility in dissolution and re-precipitation reactions of monazite host-phases. Despite the large interest in lanthanide phosphates and the interaction of actinides with these solids, very little data [6-8] is available on the complexation of lanthanides and actinides with aqueous phosphates, even though these complexation reactions precede any aqueous synthesis of monazite ceramics and are expected to occur in natural waters as well as in the proximity of monazite-containing HLW repositories. In many cases, an independent spectroscopic validation of the stoichiometry of the proposed complexes, is also missing. Both from the perspective of aqueous rhabdophane synthesis, which is often carried out at elevated temperatures, and heat-generating HLW immobilization in monazites, the lanthanide and actinide complexation reactions with aqueous phosphates under ambient conditions should be complemented with data obtained at higher temperatures.
In the present work, laser-induced luminescence spectroscopy was used to study the complexation of Cm(III) (1.15×10-8 to 1.15×10-7 M) as a function of total phosphate concentration (0 to 0.08 M) in the temperature regime 25-90 °C, using NaClO4 as a background electrolyte (I = 0.5 to 3.0 M). These studies have been conducted in the acidic pH-range (−log10 [H+] = 1.00, 2.52, 3.44, and 3.65) to avoid precipitation of solid Cm rhabdophane. For the first time, in addition to the presence of CmH2PO42+ already evidenced before [6,7], the formation of Cm(H2PO4)2+ was unambiguously established from the luminescence spectroscopic data collected at the various H+ concentrations previously mentioned [8].
The conditional complexation constants of both aqueous complexes were found to increase upon rising ionic strength and temperature. Extrapolation of the obtained complexation constants to infinite dilution at 25 °C was performed by applying the Specific Ion Interaction Theory (SIT) [9]. The obtained log10 β° values for CmH2PO42+ and Cm(H2PO4)2+ were 0.45 ± 0.04 and 0.08 ± 0.07 [8], respectively, for reactions 1 and 2 below:
Cm3+ + H3PO4 ⇌ CmH2PO42+ + H+ (1)
Cm3+ + 2 H3PO4 ⇌ Cm(H2PO4)2+ + 2 H+ (2)
The ion interaction coefficients ε(CmH2PO42+;ClO4-) = 0.17 ± 0.04 and ε(Cm(H2PO4)2+;ClO4-) = −0.10 ± 0.06 were derived at 25 °C [8].
Temperature-dependent conditional complexation constants for the identified species were obtained from the recorded luminescence emission spectra. They were subsequently extrapolated to I =0 M, assuming that the ion interaction parameters obtained at 25 °C are not significantly impacted by the temperature increase from 25 °C to 90 °C [6]. Using the integrated van´t Hoff equation, both the molar enthalpy of reaction ΔrHm° and entropy of reaction ΔrSm° values were found to be positive for the two complexes, namely CmH2PO42+ and Cm(H2PO4)2+ [8].
Relativistic quantum chemical investigations revealed a monodentate binding of the H2PO4- ligand to the central Cm3+ ion to be the most stable configuration for both complexes. By combining ab initio calculations with a thorough analysis of the obtained luminescence spectroscopic data, both CmH2PO42+ and Cm(H2PO4)2+ complexes with an overall CN of 9 were shown to be stable in solution at 25 °C. However, a different temperature-dependent evolution of the coordination of the Cm3+ ion to hydration water molecules could be derived from the electronic structure of the Cm(III)-phosphate complexes. More specifically, an overall coordination number of 9 was retained for the CmH2PO42+ complex in the investigated temperature range (25 to 90 °C), while a coordination change from 9 to 8 was established for the Cm(H2PO4)2+ species with increasing temperature [8]. This change of coordination upon increasing temperature, which has not been investigated in detail in the past, might also be relevant in the complexation of other f-elements with inorganic and/or organic ligands and deserves further exploration.
[1] R. C. Ewing, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3432 (1999).
[2] D. Bregiroux et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 366, 52 (2007).
[3] N. Huittinen et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 486, 148 (2017).
[4] E. Du Fou de Kerdaniel, J. Nucl. Mater. 362, 451 (2007).
[5] N. Huittinen et al., Inorg. Chem. 57, 6252−6265 (2018).
[6] H. Moll et al., Radiochim. Acta, 99, 775−782 (2011).
[7] N. Jordan et al., Inorg. Chem. 57, 7015-7024 (2018).
[8] N. Huittinen et al., Inorg. Chem. 60, 10656−10673 (2021).
[9] I. Grenthe et al., Second update on the chemical thermodynamics of uranium, neptunium, plutonium, americium and technetium, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency Data Bank, Eds., OECD Publications, Paris, France, (2020).
In the present work, laser-induced luminescence spectroscopy was used to study the complexation of Cm(III) (1.15×10-8 to 1.15×10-7 M) as a function of total phosphate concentration (0 to 0.08 M) in the temperature regime 25-90 °C, using NaClO4 as a background electrolyte (I = 0.5 to 3.0 M). These studies have been conducted in the acidic pH-range (−log10 [H+] = 1.00, 2.52, 3.44, and 3.65) to avoid precipitation of solid Cm rhabdophane. For the first time, in addition to the presence of CmH2PO42+ already evidenced before [6,7], the formation of Cm(H2PO4)2+ was unambiguously established from the luminescence spectroscopic data collected at the various H+ concentrations previously mentioned [8].
The conditional complexation constants of both aqueous complexes were found to increase upon rising ionic strength and temperature. Extrapolation of the obtained complexation constants to infinite dilution at 25 °C was performed by applying the Specific Ion Interaction Theory (SIT) [9]. The obtained log10 β° values for CmH2PO42+ and Cm(H2PO4)2+ were 0.45 ± 0.04 and 0.08 ± 0.07 [8], respectively, for reactions 1 and 2 below:
Cm3+ + H3PO4 ⇌ CmH2PO42+ + H+ (1)
Cm3+ + 2 H3PO4 ⇌ Cm(H2PO4)2+ + 2 H+ (2)
The ion interaction coefficients ε(CmH2PO42+;ClO4-) = 0.17 ± 0.04 and ε(Cm(H2PO4)2+;ClO4-) = −0.10 ± 0.06 were derived at 25 °C [8].
Temperature-dependent conditional complexation constants for the identified species were obtained from the recorded luminescence emission spectra. They were subsequently extrapolated to I =0 M, assuming that the ion interaction parameters obtained at 25 °C are not significantly impacted by the temperature increase from 25 °C to 90 °C [6]. Using the integrated van´t Hoff equation, both the molar enthalpy of reaction ΔrHm° and entropy of reaction ΔrSm° values were found to be positive for the two complexes, namely CmH2PO42+ and Cm(H2PO4)2+ [8].
Relativistic quantum chemical investigations revealed a monodentate binding of the H2PO4- ligand to the central Cm3+ ion to be the most stable configuration for both complexes. By combining ab initio calculations with a thorough analysis of the obtained luminescence spectroscopic data, both CmH2PO42+ and Cm(H2PO4)2+ complexes with an overall CN of 9 were shown to be stable in solution at 25 °C. However, a different temperature-dependent evolution of the coordination of the Cm3+ ion to hydration water molecules could be derived from the electronic structure of the Cm(III)-phosphate complexes. More specifically, an overall coordination number of 9 was retained for the CmH2PO42+ complex in the investigated temperature range (25 to 90 °C), while a coordination change from 9 to 8 was established for the Cm(H2PO4)2+ species with increasing temperature [8]. This change of coordination upon increasing temperature, which has not been investigated in detail in the past, might also be relevant in the complexation of other f-elements with inorganic and/or organic ligands and deserves further exploration.
[1] R. C. Ewing, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3432 (1999).
[2] D. Bregiroux et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 366, 52 (2007).
[3] N. Huittinen et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 486, 148 (2017).
[4] E. Du Fou de Kerdaniel, J. Nucl. Mater. 362, 451 (2007).
[5] N. Huittinen et al., Inorg. Chem. 57, 6252−6265 (2018).
[6] H. Moll et al., Radiochim. Acta, 99, 775−782 (2011).
[7] N. Jordan et al., Inorg. Chem. 57, 7015-7024 (2018).
[8] N. Huittinen et al., Inorg. Chem. 60, 10656−10673 (2021).
[9] I. Grenthe et al., Second update on the chemical thermodynamics of uranium, neptunium, plutonium, americium and technetium, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency Data Bank, Eds., OECD Publications, Paris, France, (2020).