Additions are biased by operands: evidence from repeated versus different operands - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Psychological Research Année : 2014

Additions are biased by operands: evidence from repeated versus different operands

Rébaï Soret
Christophe Hurter
Vsevolod Peysakhovich
André Tricot
Sébastien Puma
  • Fonction : Auteur
Rémi Capa
Michel Audiffren
  • Fonction : Auteur
Nathalie André
  • Fonction : Auteur
Florence Lespiau
  • Fonction : Auteur
Stéphanie Roussel
  • Fonction : Auteur
Camille Jeunet
  • Fonction : Auteur
Emilie Massa
  • Fonction : Auteur
Dominique Bellec
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 777205
  • IdRef : 191759716
Elisabeth Fonteneau
  • Fonction : Auteur
Ines Khazar
  • Fonction : Auteur
Julie Fonseca Cruz
  • Fonction : Auteur
Kévin Vidaud-Laperrière
  • Fonction : Auteur
Claire Brechet
Timothy Hubbard
  • Fonction : Auteur
Guillaume Herbet
Jérémy Deverdun
  • Fonction : Auteur
Nicolas de Champfleur
  • Fonction : Auteur
Hugues Duffau
Paolo Bartolomeo
  • Fonction : Auteur
François Bonnetblanc
Mitsuhiro Hayashibe
David Guiraud
  • Fonction : Auteur
Bénédicte Poulin-Charronnat
  • Fonction : Auteur
Enrique Molina
  • Fonction : Auteur
Juan Lupiáñez
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

Recent studies on covert attention suggested that the visual processing of information in front of us is different, depending on whether the information is present in front of us or if it is a reflection of information behind us (mirror information). This difference in processing suggests that we have different processes for directing our attention to objects in front of us (front space) or behind us (rear space). In this study, we investigated the effects of attentional orienting in front and rear space consecutive of visual or auditory endogenous cues. Twenty-one participants performed a modified version of the Posner paradigm in virtual reality during a spaceship discrimination task. An eye tracker integrated into the virtual reality headset was used to make sure that the participants did not move their eyes and used their covert attention. The results show that informative cues produced faster response times than non-informative cues but no impact on target identification was observed. In addition, we observed faster response times when the target occurred in front space rather than in rear space. These results are consistent with an orienting cognitive process differentiation in the front and rear spaces. Several explanations are discussed. No effect was found on subjects’ eye movements, suggesting that participants did not use their overt attention to improve task performance.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-03519392 , version 1 (10-01-2022)

Identifiants

Citer

Pom Charras, Rébaï Soret, Christophe Hurter, Vsevolod Peysakhovich, André Tricot, et al.. Additions are biased by operands: evidence from repeated versus different operands. Psychological Research, 2014, Communications in Computer and Information Science, 78 (2), pp.248-265. ⟨10.1007/s00426-013-0491-y⟩. ⟨hal-03519392⟩
31 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More