Comparative Evaluation? Yes, But With Which Alternative UI? - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2017

Comparative Evaluation? Yes, But With Which Alternative UI?

Résumé

User’s feedback provides valuable information suitable to help designers to improve their work. In this paper, we present a study on user’s feedback when evaluating a User Interface (UI) by comparison. Our aim is to define the properties that the alternative UI must satisfy to maximize the benefits of comparative evaluation. The UIs considered in the study were designed using the CAMELEON Reference Framework (CRF), covering variations at each level of abstraction. We study the impact of each variation on users’ feedback. We show that when the alternative design refers to the same task model as the original one but using a different abstract UI, the number of negative returns is significantly higher, making the comparative evaluation more productive.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
bshci17-hammami.pdf (749.26 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-03223718 , version 1 (11-05-2021)

Identifiants

Citer

Hayet Hammami, Gaëlle Calvary, Meriem Riahi, Faouzi Moussa, Sarah Bouzit. Comparative Evaluation? Yes, But With Which Alternative UI?. Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2017), Jul 2017, Sunderland, United Kingdom. pp.32:1-32:7, ⟨10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.105⟩. ⟨hal-03223718⟩
22 Consultations
75 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More