On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2004

On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks

Résumé

In this paper, we propose a survey of the use of bipolarity in argumentation frameworks, i.e. the presence of two kinds of entities (a positive entity and a negative entity). An argumentation process follows three steps: building the arguments and the interactions between them, valuating the arguments using or not the interactions and finally defining the acceptability of the arguments. This paper shows on various applications and with some formal definitions that bipolarity appears (in some cases since always) and can be used in each step of this process under different forms.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
article-nmr04.pdf (161.17 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-03198386 , version 1 (14-04-2021)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-03198386 , version 1

Citer

Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex. On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. 10th workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2004), Uncertainty Frameworks subworkshop, Jun 2004, Whistler, Canada. ⟨hal-03198386⟩
24 Consultations
92 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More