The genre of radical thought and the practices of equality: the trajectories of William Godwin and John Thelwall in the mid-1790s
Résumé
In this paper, I approach the political and philosophical similarities and differences between late eighteenth-century thinkers John Thelwall and William Godwin from the point of view of their respective choices for the genre of political communication. I approach their thought and its expression by weaving an interpretation of what they were saying with a reflection on how and to whom they were speaking. This, I contend, helps us clarify further the thought of each thinker and track the changes in their conception of equality in the framework of political communication. As the 1790s unfolded, both thinkers, I argue, tried to diversify their audience, be generally more inclusive, and re-think the hierarchies of relationship between authors/speakers and their audience in their political communication. Nevertheless, they did so asymmetrically and in different ways: Thelwall quickly started tapping into popular culture, especially oral culture, while Godwin chose the modes of fiction and the conversational essay. By making these choices, both authors enacted a different understanding and practice of political education, and political equality.
Fichier principal
HANSSON_Genre_Thelwall_Godwin_History European Ideas_VoR.pdf (211.4 Ko)
Télécharger le fichier
Origine | Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s) |
---|