Exploring Argumentation Schemes Used in Discussing Controversial Social Issues - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2018

Exploring Argumentation Schemes Used in Discussing Controversial Social Issues

Résumé

Argumentation schemes aim at representing the structure of common types of arguments used in everyday discourses. In addition to identifying a type of argumentation (e.g. "Argument from analogy,""Argument from expert opinion"), they also indicate generic version of the premise(s) and conclusion for each scheme. One of the most significant features of argumentation schemes is the inclusion of critical questions, that enable a respondent to question the content put forward by the proponent, and therefore lead to the validation or defeat of the argument; for example, for the scheme Argument from expert opinion, one of the critical questions is: "How credible is the expert cited as an expert source?". Modern research on argumentation schemes include defeasible arguments, i.e. arguments that are not strictly speaking logically valid, but are strong enough for their conclusion to be temporarily accepted, until further evidence can be put forward. These types of arguments are especially common in natural language.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-03044248 , version 1 (07-12-2020)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-03044248 , version 1

Citer

Sarah Bourse, Marie Garnier, Patrick Saint Dizier. Exploring Argumentation Schemes Used in Discussing Controversial Social Issues. 7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument workshops (COMMA 2018 workshops), Institute for Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences (IFiS PAN), Sep 2018, Varsovie, Poland. pp.(electronic medium). ⟨hal-03044248⟩
22 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More