Argumentation Reasoning - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Autre Publication Scientifique Année : 2019

Argumentation Reasoning

Résumé

Abstract argumentation is an elegant way to tackle reasoning problems in presence of conflicting information. This reasoning model finds applications in various domains such as medicine, law, or agriculture. The seminal paper by Dung defines an argumentation framework as a digraph whose nodes are abstract entities called arguments, and edges are attacks representing the conflicts between these arguments. Several acceptability semantics allow to decide which sets of arguments are accepted, depending on the properties which are expected to be satisfied by a set of arguments to be a rational “outcome” of the framework. Numerous enrichments of Dung's framework have been proposed, for example, to take into account some supports between arguments besides the attacks, or some preferences between arguments. This talk presents some of these formal frameworks, and addresses a challenging issue that has been addressed in the past few years in this context: the dynamics of abstract argumentation settings

Mots clés

Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-02976607 , version 1 (23-10-2020)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-02976607 , version 1

Citer

Sylvie Doutre. Argumentation Reasoning. 2019. ⟨hal-02976607⟩
37 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More