Comparison between GPR and four electromagnetic methods for stone characterization: an example - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Archaeological Prospection Année : 1994

Comparison between GPR and four electromagnetic methods for stone characterization: an example

Résumé

Multimethod prospection at shallow depth emphasizes capabilities of detection through the different sensitivity of each method. A comparison between four ‘integrative’ methods (electrical/ electromagnetic) and one ‘quasi‐punctual’ method (GPR) is performed to analyse individual efficiency with various physical or geometrical parameters. The chosen site is located at ‘Le Gué Goujard’ (Nièvre), known to exhibit shallow archeological features at depths rather equivalent to limestone geological settings. The different methods involved allow to distinction between them.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-02926344 , version 1 (02-09-2020)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-02926344 , version 1

Citer

Christian Camerlynck, Michel Dabas, Cédric Panissod. Comparison between GPR and four electromagnetic methods for stone characterization: an example. Archaeological Prospection, 1994, 1 (1), pp.5-17. ⟨hal-02926344⟩
36 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More