INTELLANCE 2/EORTC 1410 randomized phase II study of Depatux-M alone and with temozolomide vs temozolomide or lomustine in recurrent EGFRamplified glioblastoma - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue Neuro-Oncology Année : 2019

INTELLANCE 2/EORTC 1410 randomized phase II study of Depatux-M alone and with temozolomide vs temozolomide or lomustine in recurrent EGFRamplified glioblastoma

Martin van den Bent
Juan Manuel Sepulveda
  • Fonction : Auteur
Marion Smits
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 896904
Annemiek Walenkamp
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jean-Sebastian Frenel
  • Fonction : Auteur
Paul Clement
  • Fonction : Auteur
Filip de Vos
  • Fonction : Auteur
Nicolas Whenham
  • Fonction : Auteur
Paul Sanghera
  • Fonction : Auteur
Michael Weller
H Dubbink
  • Fonction : Auteur
Pim French
Jim Looman
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jyotirmoy Dey
  • Fonction : Auteur
Scott Krause
  • Fonction : Auteur
Pete Ansell
  • Fonction : Auteur
Sarah Nuyens
  • Fonction : Auteur
Maarten Spruyt
  • Fonction : Auteur
Joana Brilhante
  • Fonction : Auteur
Thierry Gorlia
  • Fonction : Auteur
Vassilis Golfinopoulos
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

Background: Depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M) is a tumor-specific antibody–drug conjugate consisting of an antibody (ABT-806) directed against activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the toxin monomethylauristatin-F. We investigated Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide or as a single agent in a randomized controlled phase II trial in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma. Methods: Eligible were patients with centrally confirmed EGFR amplified glioblastoma at first recurrence after chemo-irradiation with temozolomide. Patients were randomized to either Depatux-M 1.25 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously, or this treatment combined with temozolomide 150–200 mg/m2 day 1–5 every 4 weeks, or either lomustine or temozolomide. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival. Results: Two hundred sixty patients were randomized. In the primary efficacy analysis with 199 events (median follow-up 15.0 mo), the hazard ratio (HR) for the combination arm compared with the control arm was 0.71 (95% CI = 0.50, 1.02; P = 0.062). The efficacy of Depatux-M monotherapy was comparable to that of the control arm (HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.73, 1.48; P = 0.83). The most frequent toxicity in Depatux-M treated patients was a reversible corneal epitheliopathy, occurring as grades 3–4 adverse events in 25–30% of patients. In the long-term follow-up analysis with median follow-up of 28.7 months, the HR for the comparison of the combination arm versus the control arm was 0.66 (95% CI = 0.48, 0.93). Conclusion: This trial suggests a possible role for the use of Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide in EGFR amplified recurrent glioblastoma, especially in patients relapsing well after the end of first-line adjuvant temozolomide treatment. (NCT02343406)
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
noz222.pdf (280.69 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Publication financée par une institution

Dates et versions

hal-02441092 , version 1 (03-07-2024)

Identifiants

Citer

Martin van den Bent, Marica Eoli, Juan Manuel Sepulveda, Marion Smits, Annemiek Walenkamp, et al.. INTELLANCE 2/EORTC 1410 randomized phase II study of Depatux-M alone and with temozolomide vs temozolomide or lomustine in recurrent EGFRamplified glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology, 2019, 22 (5), pp.684-693. ⟨10.1093/neuonc/noz222⟩. ⟨hal-02441092⟩
92 Consultations
7 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More