Peptide synthesis: ball-milling, in solution, or on solid support, what is the best strategy? - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry Année : 2017

Peptide synthesis: ball-milling, in solution, or on solid support, what is the best strategy?

Résumé

While presenting particularly interesting advantages, peptide synthesis by ball-milling was never compared to the two traditional strategies, namely peptide syntheses in solution and on solid support (solid-phase peptide synthesis, SPPS). In this study, the challenging VVIA tetrapeptide was synthesized by ball-milling, in solution, and on solid support. The three strategies were then compared in terms of yield, purity, reaction time and environmental impact. The results obtained enabled to draw some strengths and weaknesses of each strategy, and to foresee what will have to be implemented to build more efficient and sustainable peptide syntheses in the near future.

Domaines

Chimie organique
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
2017 BJOC Peptide synthesis.pdf (579.55 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-02336152 , version 1 (28-10-2019)

Identifiants

Citer

Ophélie Maurin, Pascal Verdié, Gilles Subra, Frédéric Lamaty, Jean Martinez, et al.. Peptide synthesis: ball-milling, in solution, or on solid support, what is the best strategy?. Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2017, 13, pp.2087-2093. ⟨10.3762/bjoc.13.206⟩. ⟨hal-02336152⟩
50 Consultations
110 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More