Evaluation of Arguments in Weighted Bipolar Graphs - Archive ouverte HAL
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2017

Evaluation of Arguments in Weighted Bipolar Graphs

Résumé

The paper tackled the issue of arguments evaluation in weighted bipo-lar argumentation graphs (i.e., graphs whose arguments have basic strengths, and may be both supported and attacked). We introduce axioms that an evaluation method (or semantics) could satisfy. Such axioms are very useful for judging and comparing semantics. We then analyze existing semantics on the basis of our axioms, and finally propose a new semantics for the class of acyclic graphs.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
BAFs.pdf (101.61 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-02325999 , version 1 (22-10-2019)

Identifiants

Citer

Leila Amgoud, Jonathan Ben-Naim. Evaluation of Arguments in Weighted Bipolar Graphs. 14th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ESQARU 2017), Jul 2017, Lugano, Switzerland. ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-61581-3_3⟩. ⟨hal-02325999⟩
81 Consultations
68 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More