Evaluation of Arguments in Weighted Bipolar Graphs 1 - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue International Journal of Approximate Reasoning Année : 2018

Evaluation of Arguments in Weighted Bipolar Graphs 1

Résumé

The paper tackled the issue of arguments evaluation in weighted bipolar argumen-tation graphs (i.e., graphs whose arguments have basic strengths, and may be both supported and attacked). We introduce principles that an evaluation method (or semantics) could satisfy. Such principles are very useful for understanding the foundations of semantics, judging them, and comparing semantics. We then analyze existing semantics on the basis of our principles, and finally propose a new semantics for the class of acyclic graphs. We show that it satisfies all the principles.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Amgoud-Bennaim.pdf (185.02 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-02325836 , version 1 (22-10-2019)

Identifiants

Citer

Leila Amgoud, Jonathan Ben-Naim. Evaluation of Arguments in Weighted Bipolar Graphs 1. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2018, 99, pp.39-55. ⟨10.1016/j.ijar.2018.05.004⟩. ⟨hal-02325836⟩
125 Consultations
242 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More