From preferences over arguments to preferences over attacks in abstract argumentation: A comparative study - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Conference Papers Year : 2013

From preferences over arguments to preferences over attacks in abstract argumentation: A comparative study

Abstract

Dung's argumentation framework has been extended to consider preferences over arguments or over attacks, in a qualitative or in a quantitative way. In this paper, we investigate the relationships between preferences over arguments and preferences over attacks. We give conditions on the definition of preferences over attacks from preferences over arguments. Following these principles, we propose different instantiations of an AFvs (argumentation framework with attacks of various strength), when preferences over arguments are available. Our proposal is compared to existing work, particularly regarding the conditions in which the defence holds.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
cayrol_12762.pdf (154.6 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)

Dates and versions

hal-01148809 , version 1 (05-05-2015)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-01148809 , version 1
  • OATAO : 12762

Cite

Claudette Cayrol, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex. From preferences over arguments to preferences over attacks in abstract argumentation: A comparative study. 25th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence - ICTAI 2013, Nov 2013, Washington, DC, United States. pp. 588-595. ⟨hal-01148809⟩
75 View
111 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More