Educated consumers don’t believe artificial meat is the solution to the problems with the meat industry
Abstract
The production of
in vitro
meat by cell culture has been suggested by some scientists as one solution to address the major
challenges facing our society. Firstly, consumers would like the meat industry to reduce potential discomfort of animals on
modern farms, or even to avoid killing animals to eat them. Secondly, citizens would like meat producers to reduce potential
environmental deterioration by livestock and finally, there is a need to reduce world hunger by increasing protein resources
while the global population is predicted to grow rapidly. According to its promoters, artificial meat has a potential to make
eating animals unnecessary, to reduce carbon footprint of meat production and to satisfy all the nutritional needs and desires
of consumers and citizens. To check these assumptions, a total of 817 educated people (mainly scientists and students)
were interviewed worldwide by internet in addition to 865 French educated people. We also interviewed 208 persons
(mainly scientists) after an oral presentation regarding artificial meat. Results of the three surveys were similar, but differed
between males and females. More than half of the respondents believed that “artificial meat” was feasible and realistic.
However, there was no majority to think that artificial meat will be healthy and tasty, except respondents who were in favour
of artificial meat. A large majority of the respondents believed that the meat industry is facing important problems related
to the protection of the environment, animal welfare or inefficient meat production to feed humanity. However, respondents
did not believe that artificial meat will be the solution to solve the mentioned problems with the meat industry, especially
respondents who were against artificial meat. The vast majority of consumers wished to continue to eat meat even they
would accept to consume less meat in a context of increasing food needs. Only a minority of respondents (from 5 to 11%)
would recommend or accept to eat
in vitro
meat instead of meat produced from farm animals. Despite these limitations,
38 to 47% of the respondents would continue to support research on artificial meat, but a majority of them believed that
artificial meat will not be accepted by consumers in the future, except for respondents who were in favour of artificial meat.
We speculated that the apparent contradictory answers to this survey expressed the fact that people trust scientists who are supposed to continuously discover new technologies potentially useful in a long term future for the human beings, but
people also expressed concern for their health and were not convinced that artificial meat will be tasty, safe and healthy
enough to be accepted by consumers
Fichier principal
Hocquette A 011--JIA-2014-0248_{E210271A-9E80-46F8-924E-FC0C1B692F57}.pdf (815.98 Ko)
Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Explicit agreement for this submission
Loading...