A comparison of direct and distance sampling methods to estimate abundance of nesting gulls - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue ARDEOLA Année : 2013

A comparison of direct and distance sampling methods to estimate abundance of nesting gulls

Résumé

We compared the performances of the strip transect count method and the distance sampling method during colony surveys of large gulls to estimate the total number of nests. Ten colonies were surveyed by both methods. Nest detection probabilities varied from 0.519 ± 0.064 to 0.706 ± 0.049 and the average nest detection probability was 0.614 ± 0.015. Nest densities were highly variable, ranging from 77 nests/ha to 717 nests/ha. Estimates of the number of nests obtained by the strip transect count method averaged 9.3% lower than those obtained by distance sampling but by as much as 31% in some colonies. Underestimation by the strip transect counts increased at high nest densities (Kendall t = −0.556, P = 0.032). The strip transect method needed on average 6.5 observers per colony surveyed, whereas the distance sampling method required 1.4 observers per colony. In addition, the mean time spent per colony was 3 hours vs 1.7 hours for the strip transect and distance sampling methods respectively. Combining both these measures of effort, distance sampling required on average 87% less effort in the field than the strip transect method. We strongly advocate the use of distance sampling for surveys of large gull colonies.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-00957999 , version 1 (11-03-2014)

Identifiants

Citer

Christophe Barbraud, M. Fortin, Yohan Charbonnier, Karine Delord, Hélène Gadenne, et al.. A comparison of direct and distance sampling methods to estimate abundance of nesting gulls. ARDEOLA, 2013, 61 (2), pp.367-377. ⟨10.13157/arla.61.2.2014.367⟩. ⟨hal-00957999⟩

Collections

CNRS INRA INRAE
63 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More