Pré-Publication, Document De Travail Année : 2011

On the mathematical theory of evidence and Dempster's rule of combination

Résumé

In this paper we present an analysis of the use of Dempster's rule of combination, its consistency with the probability calculus and its usefulness for combining sources of evidence expressed by belief functions in the framework of the Mathematical Theory of Evidence, known also as Dempster-Shafer Theory (DST), or as the classical theory of belief functions. We show that the direct combination of original basic belief assignments of sources of evidence with Dempster's rule is inconsistent with probability calculus and we explain this from a simple experimental protocol. We also show how Dempster's rule can be reconciled with probability calculus for such examples if the combination of sources is done differently. In that case the notion of conflict between sources of evidence becomes meaningless (it just vanishes) because Dempster's rule coincides with the pure conjunctive operator, and the entire fusion process becomes comparable to simple application of Total Probability Theorem (i.e. the weighted average fusion rule). While a direct application of Dempster's rule becomes questionable in the most general case, then arises the need of a methodoloy for organizing and implementing the combination rules with respect to the applications.

Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
HAL-AnalysisOfDST.pdf (166.49 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Licence
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-00591633 , version 1 (09-05-2011)

Licence

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-00591633 , version 1

Citer

Jean Dezert, Albena Tchamova, Frederic Dambreville. On the mathematical theory of evidence and Dempster's rule of combination. 2011. ⟨hal-00591633⟩

Collections

237 Consultations
770 Téléchargements

Partager

  • More