Mobilising criteria in arguing about product solutions : a motor for designer convergence during a project review? - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2008

Mobilising criteria in arguing about product solutions : a motor for designer convergence during a project review?

Résumé

In the context of market globalization, companies are now collaborating; concurrent engineering has taken the place of sequential engineering and therefore is generating many changes in designers' work. Inspired by studies in argumentation, our objective in this article is to model the dynamics of human interactions by which designers construct a common ground, allowing them to converge during the decision process. Our ultimate goal is to propose methods and tools that support designers during the decision process. Through two original representations, we analyze a project review meeting at AB Volvo and show how in their quest to satisfy criteria, designers are led to propose new solution elements and thus to come to agreement.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-00369496 , version 1 (20-03-2009)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-00369496 , version 1

Citer

Jean-Laurent Cassier, Guy Prudhomme, Kristine Lund. Mobilising criteria in arguing about product solutions : a motor for designer convergence during a project review?. INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE - DESIGN 2008, May 2008, Dubrovnik, Croatia. ⟨hal-00369496⟩
94 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More