Sequential Compatibility Effects and Cognitive Control: Does Conflict Really Matter? - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance Year : 2005

Sequential Compatibility Effects and Cognitive Control: Does Conflict Really Matter?

Abstract

Although it is widely accepted that control mechanisms are necessary for human behavior to be adapted, very little is known about how such mechanisms are recruited. A suggestion to fill the gap was put forward by M. M. Botvinick, T. S. Braver, C. S. Carter, D. M. Barch, and J. D. Cohen (2001), who proposed the conflict-loop theory. This theory has been successful in accounting for the reduction of compatibility effects after an incompatible trial: The level of conflict being, on average, higher during an incompatible trial, more control occurs after such a trial. The authors have tested this prediction by sorting the trials on the basis of amount of conflict (quantified by the electromyographic activity) they presented. A reduction of the compatibility effect was observed after incompatible trials, but it was independent of the level of conflict on previous trials, suggesting that the conflict does not trigger changes in executive control. Consequences for the conflict monitoring model are discussed.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Burle_et_al_JEPHPP_05_authorsCopy.pdf (268.8 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-00093366 , version 1 (06-12-2016)

Identifiers

Cite

Boris Burle, Sonia Allain, Franck Vidal, Thierry Hasbroucq. Sequential Compatibility Effects and Cognitive Control: Does Conflict Really Matter?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2005, 31 (4), pp.831 - 837. ⟨10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.831⟩. ⟨hal-00093366⟩

Collections

CNRS UNIV-AMU LNC
47 View
199 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More