The norms of thought: are they social? - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Mind and Society Année : 2002

The norms of thought: are they social?

Pascal Engel

Résumé

A commonplace in contemporary philosophy is that mental content has normative properties. A number of writers associate this view to the idea that the normativity of content is essentially connected to its social character. I agree with the first thesis, but disagree with the second. The paper examines three kinds of view according to which the norms of thought and content are social: Wittgenstein's rule following considerations, Davidson's triangulation argument, and Brandom's inferential pragmatics, and criticises each. It is argued that there are objective conceptual norms constitutive of mental content, but that these are not essentially social. A commonplace in contemporary philosophy is that mental content has normative properties. A number of writers associate this view to the idea that the normativity of content is essentially connected to its social character. I agree with the first thesis, but disagree with the second. The paper examines three kinds of view according to which the norms of thought and content are social: Wittgenstein's rule following considerations, Davidson's triangulation argument, and Brandom's inferential pragmatics, and criticises each. It is argued that there are objective conceptual norms constitutive of mental content, but that these are not essentially social.

Domaines

Sociologie
index.html (134.73 Ko) Télécharger le fichier

Dates et versions

ijn_00000250 , version 1 (01-11-2002)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : ijn_00000250 , version 1

Citer

Pascal Engel. The norms of thought: are they social?. Mind and Society, 2002, 2 (3), pp.129-148. ⟨ijn_00000250⟩
23 Consultations
17 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More