We propose a solution to the classical problem of Hurwicz and Schmeidler [1978] and Maskin [1999] according to which no Pareto efficient rule is Nash implementable. To this end, we consider implementation through mechanisms that are deterministic-in-equilibrium while lotteries are allowed off-equilibrium. We show that there are Pareto efficient rules which are implementable and that any such rule is implementable through some simple veto mechanism. Importantly , neither completeness nor transitivity of the preferences over lotteries are required to achieve implementation.