Association of Noninvasive Respiratory Support with Extubation Outcomes in Brain-injured Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Secondary Analysis of the ENIO Prospective Observational Study - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Année : 2023

Association of Noninvasive Respiratory Support with Extubation Outcomes in Brain-injured Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Secondary Analysis of the ENIO Prospective Observational Study

Shaurya Taran
Camilo Diaz-Cruz
  • Fonction : Auteur
Daniel Agustin Godoy
  • Fonction : Auteur
Mohan Gurjar
  • Fonction : Auteur
Julio Cesar Mijangos
  • Fonction : Auteur
Yoshitoyo Ueno
  • Fonction : Auteur
Christopher Yarnell

Résumé

Rationale: Noninvasive respiratory support using a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) can decrease the risk of reintubation in patients being liberated from mechanical ventilation, but effects in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) are unknown. Objectives: To evaluate the association between postextubation noninvasive respiratory support and reintubation in patients with ABI being liberated from mechanical ventilation. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective, observational study of mechanically ventilated patients with ABI (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03400904). The primary endpoint was reintubation during ICU admission. We used mixed-effects logistic regression models with patient-level covariates and random intercepts for hospital and country to evaluate the association between prophylactic (i.e., planned) HFNC or NIPPV and reintubation. Measurements and Main Results: 1,115 patients were included from 62 hospitals and 19 countries, of whom 267 received HFNC or NIPPV following extubation (23.9%). Compared with conventional oxygen therapy, neither prophylactic HFNC nor NIPPV was associated with decreased odds of reintubation (respectively, odds ratios of 0.97 [95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.73] and 0.63 [0.30-1.32]). Findings remained consistent in sensitivity analyses accounting for alternate adjustment procedures, missing data, shorter time frames of the primary endpoint, and competing risks precluding reintubation. In a Bayesian analysis using skeptical and data-driven priors, the probabilities of reduced reintubation ranged from 17% to 34% for HFNC and from 46% to 74% for NIPPV. Conclusions: In a large cohort of brain-injured patients undergoing liberation from mechanical ventilation, prophylactic use of HFNC and NIPPV were not associated with reintubation. Prospective trials are needed to confirm treatment effects in this population. Primary study registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03400904).
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-04771958 , version 1 (07-11-2024)

Identifiants

Citer

Shaurya Taran, Camilo Diaz-Cruz, Bastien Perrot, Pablo Alvarez, Daniel Agustin Godoy, et al.. Association of Noninvasive Respiratory Support with Extubation Outcomes in Brain-injured Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Secondary Analysis of the ENIO Prospective Observational Study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2023, 208 (3), pp.270-279. ⟨10.1164/rccm.202212-2249OC⟩. ⟨hal-04771958⟩
4 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More