Disagreement Between Clinicians and Score in Decision-Making Capacity of Critically Ill Patients* - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue Critical Care Medicine Année : 2019

Disagreement Between Clinicians and Score in Decision-Making Capacity of Critically Ill Patients*

Bruno Pereira
  • Fonction : Auteur
Mireille Adda
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jean-François Timsit
  • Fonction : Auteur
Michel Wolff
  • Fonction : Auteur
Gilles Hilbert
  • Fonction : Auteur
Didier Gruson
  • Fonction : Auteur
Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas
  • Fonction : Auteur
Laurent Argaud
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jean-Michel Constantin
  • Fonction : Auteur
Russel Chabanne
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jean-Pierre Quenot
  • Fonction : Auteur
Julien Bohe
  • Fonction : Auteur
Claude Guerin
  • Fonction : Auteur
Laurent Papazian
  • Fonction : Auteur
Olivier Jonquet
  • Fonction : Auteur
Kada Klouche
  • Fonction : Auteur
Arnaud Delahaye
  • Fonction : Auteur
Beatrice Riu
  • Fonction : Auteur
Laurent Zieleskiewicz
  • Fonction : Auteur
Michaël Darmon
  • Fonction : Auteur
Elie Azoulay
  • Fonction : Auteur
Bertrand Souweine
  • Fonction : Auteur
Alexandre Lautrette
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

Objectives: To compare the assessment of decision-making capacity of ICU patients by attending clinicians (physicians, nurses, and residents) with a capacity score measured by the Mini-Mental Status Examination, completed by Aid to Capacity Evaluation if necessary. The primary outcome was agreement between physicians’ assessments and the score. Secondary outcomes were agreement between nurses’ or residents’ assessments and the score and identification of factors associated with disagreement. Design: A 1-day prevalence study. Setting: Nineteen ICUs in France. Subjects: All patients hospitalized in the ICU on the study day and the attending clinicians. Interventions: The decision-making capacity of patients was assessed by the attending clinicians and independently by an observer using the score. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 206 patients were assessed by 213 attending clinicians (57 physicians, 97 nurses, and 59 residents). Physicians designated more patients as having decision-making capacity ( n = 92/206 [45%]) than score ( n = 34/206 [17%]; absolute difference 28% [95% CI, 20–37%]; p = 0.001). There was a high disagreement between assessments of all clinicians and score (Kappa coefficient 0.39 [95% CI, 0.29–0.50] for physicians; 0.39 [95% CI, 0.27–0.52] for nurses; and 0.46 [95% CI, 0.35–0.58] for residents). The main factor associated with disagreement was a Glasgow Coma Scale score between 10 and 15 (odds ratio, 2.92 [1.18–7.19], p = 0.02 for physicians; 4.97 [1.50–16.45], p = 0.01 for nurses; and 3.39 [1.12–10.29], p = 0.03 for residents) without differentiating between the Glasgow Coma Scale scores from 10 to 15. Conclusions: The decision-making capacity of ICU patients was largely overestimated by all attending clinicians as compared with a score. The main factor associated with disagreement was a Glasgow Coma Scale score between 10 and 15, suggesting that clinicians confused consciousness with decision-making capacity.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-04723604 , version 1 (07-10-2024)

Identifiants

Citer

Pierre-Marie Bertrand, Bruno Pereira, Mireille Adda, Jean-François Timsit, Michel Wolff, et al.. Disagreement Between Clinicians and Score in Decision-Making Capacity of Critically Ill Patients*. Critical Care Medicine, 2019, 47 (3), pp.337-344. ⟨10.1097/ccm.0000000000003550⟩. ⟨hal-04723604⟩
3 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More