Restrictive versus Decision Support Guided Fluid Therapy During Major Hepatic Resection Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue (Data Paper) Anesthesiology Année : 2024

Restrictive versus Decision Support Guided Fluid Therapy During Major Hepatic Resection Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sean Coeckelenbergh
  • Fonction : Auteur
Maxim Proux-Soucy
  • Fonction : Auteur
Philippe van der Linden
  • Fonction : Auteur
Maya Moussa
  • Fonction : Auteur
Hiromi Kato
  • Fonction : Auteur
Leila Toubal
  • Fonction : Auteur
Salima Naili
  • Fonction : Auteur
Joseph Rinehart
  • Fonction : Auteur
Tristan Grogan
  • Fonction : Auteur
Maxime Cannesson
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jacques Duranteau
  • Fonction : Auteur
Alexandre Joosten

Résumé

Background Fluid therapy during major hepatic resection aims at minimizing fluids during the dissection phase to reduce central venous pressure (CVP), retrograde liver blood flow, and venous bleeding. This strategy, however, may lead to hyperlactatemia. The Acumen™ Assisted Fluid Management system uses novel decision support software whose algorithm helps clinicians optimize fluid therapy. We tested the hypothesis that using this decision support system could decrease arterial lactate at the end of major hepatic resection when compared to a more restrictive fluid strategy. Methods This two-arm, prospective, randomized controlled, assessor-and patient-blinded superiority study included consecutive patients undergoing major liver surgery equipped with an arterial catheter linked to an uncalibrated stroke volume monitor. In the decision support group, fluid therapy was guided throughout the entire procedure using the assisted fluid management software. In the restrictive fluid group, clinicians were recommended to restrict fluid infusion to 1-2 ml.kg-1.h-1 until the completion of hepatectomy. They then administered fluids based on advanced hemodynamic variables. Noradrenaline was titrated in all patients to maintain a mean arterial pressure >65mmHg. The primary outcome was arterial lactate level upon completion of surgery (i.e., skin closure). Results Ninety patients were enrolled over a 7-month period. The primary outcome was lower in the decision support group than in the restrictive group (median[Q1-Q3] 2.5[1.9-3.7]mmol.L-1 vs 4.6[3.1-5.4]mmol.L-1, median difference -2.1, 95%CI(-2.7,-1.2), p<0.001). Among secondary exploratory outcomes, there was no difference in blood loss (median[Q1-Q3] 450[300-600]ml vs 500[300-800]ml, p=0.727) although CVP was higher in the decision support group (mean (SD) of 7.7(2.0)mmHg vs 6.6(1.1)mmHg, p<0.002). Conclusion Patients managed using a clinical decision support system to guide fluid administration during major hepatic resection had a lower arterial lactate concentration at the end of surgery when compared to a more restrictive fluid strategy. Future trials are necessary to make conclusive recommendations that will change clinical practice.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-04685876 , version 1 (03-09-2024)

Identifiants

Citer

Sean Coeckelenbergh, Maxim Proux-Soucy, Philippe van der Linden, Stephanie Roullet, Maya Moussa, et al.. Restrictive versus Decision Support Guided Fluid Therapy During Major Hepatic Resection Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.. Anesthesiology, 2024, ⟨10.1097/ALN.0000000000005175⟩. ⟨hal-04685876⟩
19 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More