Assessment of current methane emission quantification techniques for natural gas midstream applications - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Année : 2024

Assessment of current methane emission quantification techniques for natural gas midstream applications

Yunsong Liu
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1382471
Violeta Bescós Roy
  • Fonction : Auteur
Tania Meixus Fernandez
  • Fonction : Auteur
Rasmus Andersen
  • Fonction : Auteur
Andrés Russu Berlanga
  • Fonction : Auteur
Emil Christensen
  • Fonction : Auteur
Yann Courtois
  • Fonction : Auteur
Sebastian Dominok
  • Fonction : Auteur
Corentin Dussenne
  • Fonction : Auteur
Travis Eckert
  • Fonction : Auteur
Andrew Finlayson
  • Fonction : Auteur
Aurora Fernández de la Fuente
  • Fonction : Auteur
Catlin Gunn
  • Fonction : Auteur
Ram Hashmonay
  • Fonction : Auteur
Juliano Grigoleto Hayashi
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jonathan Helmore
  • Fonction : Auteur
Soeren Honsel
  • Fonction : Auteur
Fabrizio Innocenti
Matti Irjala
Torgrim Log
  • Fonction : Auteur
Cristina Lopez
  • Fonction : Auteur
Francisco Cortés Martínez
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jonathan Martinez
  • Fonction : Auteur
Adrien Massardier
  • Fonction : Auteur
Helle Gottschalk Nygaard
  • Fonction : Auteur
Paula Agregan Reboredo
  • Fonction : Auteur
Elodie Rousset
  • Fonction : Auteur
Axel Scherello
  • Fonction : Auteur
Matthias Ulbricht
  • Fonction : Auteur
Damien Weidmann
Oliver Williams
  • Fonction : Auteur
Nigel Yarrow
  • Fonction : Auteur
Murès Zarea
  • Fonction : Auteur
Robert Ziegler
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jean Sciare
  • Fonction : Auteur
Mihalis Vrekoussis

Résumé

Abstract. Methane emissions from natural gas systems are increasingly scrutinized, and accurate reporting requires quantification of site- and source-level measurement. We evaluate the performance of 10 available state-of-the-art CH4 emission quantification approaches against a blind controlled-release experiment at an inerted natural gas compressor station in 2021. The experiment consisted of 17 blind 2 h releases at a single exhaust point or multiple simultaneous ones. The controlled releases covered a range of methane flow rates from 0.01 to 50 kg h−1. Measurement platforms included aircraft, drones, trucks, vans, ground-based stations, and handheld systems. Herewith, we compare their respective strengths, weaknesses, and potential complementarity depending on the emission rates and atmospheric conditions. Most systems were able to quantify the releases within an order of magnitude. The level of errors from the different systems was not significantly influenced by release rates larger than 0.1 kg h−1, with much poorer results for the 0.01 kg h−1 release. It was found that handheld optical gas imaging (OGI) cameras underestimated the emissions. In contrast, the “site-level” systems, relying on atmospheric dispersion, tended to overestimate the emission rates. We assess the dependence of emission quantification performance on key parameters such as wind speed, deployment constraints, and measurement duration. At the low wind speeds encountered (below 2 m s−1), the experiments did not reveal a significant dependence on wind speed. The ability to quantify individual sources degraded during multiple-source releases. Compliance with the Oil and Gas Methane Partnership's (OGMP 2.0) highest level of reporting may require a combination of the specific advantages of each measurement technique and will depend on reconciliation approaches. Self-reported uncertainties were either not available or were based on the standard deviation in a series of independent realizations or fixed values from expert judgment or theoretical considerations. For most systems, the overall relative errors estimated in this study are higher than self-reported uncertainties.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
amt-17-1633-2024.pdf (2.79 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Dates et versions

hal-04574764 , version 1 (14-05-2024)

Identifiants

Citer

Yunsong Liu, Jean-Daniel Paris, Gregoire Broquet, Violeta Bescós Roy, Tania Meixus Fernandez, et al.. Assessment of current methane emission quantification techniques for natural gas midstream applications. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2024, 17 (6), pp.1633 - 1649. ⟨10.5194/amt-17-1633-2024⟩. ⟨hal-04574764⟩
0 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More